ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of iGel and THRIVE on Bronchoscopic Interventions
THRIVE and iGEL were applied for maintain oxygenation in bronchoscopic interventions which could not performed with an endotracheal tube. However, besides the risk of desaturation, the differences on difficulties to approach vocal cords, the responses to spay of local anesthetics including cough or spasm, the CO2 elimination, the hemodynamic changes, and the effects on postoperative recovery are rarely investigated.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intratracheal Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Smooth Tracheal Extubation#899776
- Comparison of Ease of I-gel Insertion With Two Different Techniques in Adults#1100728
- High- and Moderate-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training on Diaphragm Ultrasound Parameters, Cognition, and Mental Health#1007206
- Effectiveness of Vibrating Mesh Versus Small Volume Nebuliser in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)#874276
- A Low Dose Remifentanil Infusion During Tracheal Extubation in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients#1009860
Record · ID 1397418
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive