arXiv (All)
open access
How Do People Evaluate Non-Ideal Budgets? Evidence from Pairwise Comparisons
Budget aggregation allows citizens to express their ideal budget allocations, which a predetermined rule combines into a collective allocation. Existing theoretical work on budget-aggregation rules often relies on assumptions about how voters evaluate allocations that differ from their ideals, yet t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CAPM-based capital budgeting and nonadditivity#1277499
- CAPM-based capital budgeting and nonadditivity#1277471
- CAPM-based capital budgeting and nonadditivity#1277457
- Uncertainty-Aware Budget Allocation for Adaptive Test-Time Reasoning#1248457
- Committees Versus Individuals: An Experimental Analysis of Monetary Policy Decision Making#499893
Record · ID 1399746
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive