arXiv (All)
open access
Standardization of Post-Publication Code Verification is Possible with the Support of the Community
Reproducibility remains a challenge in machine learning research. While code and data availability requirements have become increasingly common, post-publication verification is still limited and unformalized. This position paper argues that journals and conference proceedings should all implement a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues#820515
- Machine Learning Operations for Reproducible Research#475542
- Skill Issue: Lessons from Optimizing Repository SKILLs for Coding Agents#1070213
- Sustainability of Open-Source Machine Learning Robustness Assessment Tools: A Repository Mining Study#618630
- UltraData-Code: From Raw Repositories to Algorithmically Dense and Task-Oriented Code Data#1388526
Record · ID 1399781
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive