arXiv (All)
open access
Safe, or Simply Incapable? Rethinking Safety Evaluation for Phone-Use Agents
When a phone-use agent avoids harm, does that show safety, or simply inability to act? Existing evaluations often cannot tell. A harmful outcome may be avoided because the agent recognized the risk and chose the safe action, or because it failed to understand the screen or execute any relevant actio
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#793321
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#789317
- Risky-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Safety Risks in Real-World Life-Assist Deployments#1326197
- Multimodal Safety Evaluation Should Measure Controllability Beyond Classification#1215555
- Identifying safety risks and variances in an Integrated Urgent Care telephone triage system using modified Macroergonomic Analysis and Design (MEAD)#309666
Record · ID 1399854
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive