arXiv (All)
open access
Assessing the Empirical Evidence for Loss of Control from Agentic General-Purpose AI
Theoretical literature warns that advanced generalist agentic systems might pursue instrumental goals that are misaligned with human preferences, thus posing risks of irreversible loss of human control. The EU's Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI lists loss of control as a systemic risk that mu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EnactOpt: Diagnosis-Guided Harness Evolution for Embodied Agents#1325873
- The Core-Modulation Architecture: Paper 4 of 14 (d-AIB) Why General AI Inherited the Body: A Structural Account of Embodied Modulation under Monolithic Imitation#122413
- AREAs-Lab: An Interactive Environment for AI-driven Requirement Elicitation for AI Systems#793206
- AREAs-Lab: An Interactive Environment for AI-driven Requirement Elicitation for AI Systems#789202
- AI Revealed Preferences#971869
Record · ID 1400073
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive