arXiv (All)
open access
SPLASH: Contrastive Audit Pressure for Detecting and Localizing Security Hallucinations in Generated Code
Code generated by large language models often passes every functional test while remaining insecure. These security hallucinations are common, written with high confidence, and repeated across samples, so neither the generator's own uncertainty nor static analyzers reliably catch them. We introduce
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SPLASH: Contrastive Audit Pressure for Detecting and Localizing Security Hallucinations in Generated Code#1381139
- Identity or Prompt Noise? A Calibrated Invariance Audit of LLM Code Generation#1037194
- Identity or Prompt Noise? A Calibrated Invariance Audit of LLM Code Generation#1028784
- Verification Trap: Understanding Test-Time Selection Failures under False Premises in Code Generation#1201183
- Declarations as Boundary Conditions: A Fixture-Level Audit of the Uniqueness Reading#722508
Record · ID 1401187
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive