arXiv (All)
open access
ECHO: Revealing Review-to-Submission Linkage in Anonymous Peer Review
Anonymous peer review protects reviewers from retaliation, yet reviewer anonymity may also be weakened by artifacts released through the review process itself. This risk is growing as many venues require submitting authors to review, creating substantial overlap between authors and reviewers within
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review#973418
- Anonymous: a social movement#649261
- Singling Out People Without Knowing Their Names Behavioural Targeting, Pseudonymous Data, and the New Data Protection Regulation#461946
- Singling out people without knowing their names – Behavioural targeting, pseudonymous data, and the new Data Protection Regulation#461807
- Ending the Peer Review Crisis: Sharing Revenues with Reviewers#392065
Record · ID 1402432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive