arXiv (All)
open access
On the LLM Verification for Argument Graph Generation
Multi-agent LLM systems can formalize natural-language argumentation end-to-end, turning plain text into structured graphs by classifying components, connecting them with relations, and enriching the resulting graphs into formal models. Quality assurance for those graphs is almost always another LLM
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DARE: Dialectical Agentic Reasoning for Structured Knowledge Fact Checking#1083306
- LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios#1156205
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#819377
- Argument Quality Assessment with Large Language Models: A Pairwise Bradley-Terry Approach#809384
- Program Analysis Guided LLM Agent for Proof-of-Concept Generation#2686
Record · ID 1402749
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive