arXiv (All)
open access
The More the Better? A Comparison of Single- and Multi-Agent LLM Setups on a Financial Review Task
Practitioner guidance holds that a large language model reviews a document better when the work is divided among agents. We test a narrow form of it in a controlled comparison of single-agent and multi-agent setups on a financial task, reviewing credit assessment memos against requirements. One agen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Rewards for Budget-Aware Multi-Turn Agents That Adapt to Arbitrary Test-Time Constraints#1394255
- The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean#986988
- FromPitch2Board: Benchmarking LLM Agents in Long-Horizon Football Management#1128969
- Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questions#1037686
- Clinical Concept Centers in LLMs#1187143
Record · ID 1403284
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive