arXiv (All)
open access
Large Teams Consistently Develop Science
Scientific progress depends on both developing established knowledge and disrupting it to make way for new ideas. Using the disruption index (D), our previous work showed that large teams tend to develop science, while small teams are more likely to disrupt it. Recent work challenges this finding, a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Summary of Research in Science Education--1990.#487767
- Large scientific teams are more, not less, disruptive#1216704
- Changes In Scientific Publishing: A Heuristic For Analysis#657602
- Tackling hostility towards scientists. Five complementary educational resources to equip institutions and individual researchers with knowledge and skills.#171156
- The Advantage of Big Team Sciences: Lessons Learned from Cognitive Science#357533
Record · ID 1403445
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive