arXiv (All)
open access
Does Multi-Agent Collaboration Pay When Agents Serve Users? Testing Agent Scaling in Dual-Control Settings
Multi-agent systems (MAS) built from language models are deployed on the premise that collaboration beats a single-agent system (SAS), yet when it pays is unclear. The most systematic study to date gives a capability-saturation rule: coordination helps while the SAS is weak and hurts once it is stro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Worse Together: How Performance Breaks Down in Multi-User Multi-Agent Teams#1155518
- Same Game, Different Story: A Minimal Conservative Strategic Robustness Benchmark for Large Language Model Agents#998306
- Do Small Language Models Learn to Negotiate? A Controlled Scaling Study of RL-Trained Sellers#1202623
- Why Better Models Can Create Riskier Systems: Evidence from LLM Agents in Financial Markets#927667
- CollabFlow: Recursive Self-Improvement of Agent Collaboration#1143263
Record · ID 1403451
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive