PsyArXiv
metadata only
AI Policies Reduce but Do Not Eliminate the Moral Penalty of Using AI
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) now helps people write essays, reports, and even personal speeches, but people who use it can pay a social price through negative interpersonal judgement. We investigated whether people judge AI users as less moral, potential boundary conditions, and whether t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Policies Reduce but Do Not Eliminate the Moral Penalty of Using AI#1405138
- AI systems must not confuse users about their sentience or moral status#102774
- The Hard Problem of AI Alignment: Value Forks in Moral Judgment#92711
- A Tool, Not an Author: Limiting Generative AI in Adjudicatory Decisionmaking#1055217
- A Tool, Not an Author: Limiting Generative AI in Adjudicatory Decisionmaking#1055199
Record · ID 1404991
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive