OSF
open access
Modeling Word Counts: Common Practice Risks False Positives
Word counts or relative frequencies (e.g. the number of self-related words as a proportion of total words in a text) are routinely analyzed as dependent variables in the behavioral sciences. We demonstrate that conventional methods of analyzing word counts in this way are likely to lead to false pos
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Modeling Word Counts: Common Practice Risks False Positives#1404981
- Measuring language model welfare based on verbal report: An analogical abductive approach#228640
- Implicit Bias in Large Language Model Diagnosis of Eating Disorders: Experimental Vignette Study.#1080602
- Compute Where it Counts: Self Optimizing Language Models#175253
- A Robust statistical model of word frequencies#938796
Record · ID 1405152
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive