arXiv CS
open access
Monitorability Is Trainable: Post-Training for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is one of the few practical tools available for overseeing capable AI systems, but it is fragile: a model's reasoning is only useful to a monitor if it remains coupled to what the model actually does. This coupling can be degraded during training through, for exampl
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Monitorability Is Trainable: Post-Training for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability#1414339
- AI Safety: Not Optional, Not Later#999906
- AISafetyBenchExplorer: A Metric-Aware Catalogue of AI Safety Benchmarks Reveals Fragmented Measurement and Weak Benchmark Governance#13134
- Before They Can Solve: Predicting Post-Training Coding-Agent Performance from Base Models#1234903
- Before They Can Solve: Predicting Post-Training Coding-Agent Performance from Base Models#1227367
Record · ID 1406474
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive