ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomized Trial of Active vs Passive Splinting for Extensor Tendon Injuries in Zones IV to VI
This study compares two methods of post-operative immobilization after surgical repair (tenorrhaphy) of extensor tendons in the fingers. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a standard plaster splint or an alternative splinting method that allows controlled finger movement (ICAMS). The main goal was to determine which method leads to better recovery in terms of finger mobility, grip strength, pain, and patient comfort.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Dynamic Hand Splint on Hand ROM Post Extensor Tendon Repair#915078
- Passive Mobilization With Place and Hold vs Active Mobilization Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair#1151477
- Effectiveness of Night Splinting After Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy in Dupuytren's Contracture#1375358
- Distraction vs Interposition Arthroplasty for Basilar Thumb Osteoarthritis#979715
- Tendon Transfer for Correction of Pinch in Chronic Ulnar Nerve Injury#839878
Record · ID 1407269
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive