ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Articaine Efficacy and Safety for 3 Years Old Children
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the local anesthetic efficacy and safety of 4% Articaine compared 2% Mepivicaine in 3 years old children, by using infiltration technique for primary teeth that required restorative, pulp therapy, or dental extraction procedure, as assessed by measuring the pain experience during injection and treatment procedures, child's behavior during the procedure, and postoperative complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Articaine Efficacy and Safety for Children Below Age of 4-years#1074771
- Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% for Local Anesthesia of MIH-affected Maxillary Molars#846484
- Comparative study on the anesthetic efficacy between Articaine 4% and Lidocaine 2% in blocking the included lower third molars.#411567
- Articaine 4% Efficacy and Safety in Extraction and Pulpotomy of Primary Molars of Children Below the Age of Four Years#1088754
- The Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Management of Postoperative Pain in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit#837441
Record · ID 1411030
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive