arXiv (All)
open access
Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees
A major bottleneck in characterizing the failure modes of generative AI systems is the cost and time of annotation and evaluation. Consequently, adaptive testing paradigms have gained popularity, where one opportunistically decides which cases and how many to annotate based on past results. While th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The geometry of AI validation: From structural blindness to reusable audits#1070909
- The Fixation of Belief in Machines: Disciplined Contestation as an Alternative to Mutual Adversarial Oversight#695945
- Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level#609125
- Next-Gen Test Automation in Life Insurance: Self-Healing Frameworks#95357
- Trustworthy RAG: An Evaluation Agent for Detecting Misinformation and Knowledge Poisoning in Generative AI Systems#662268
Record · ID 1412811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive