arXiv (All)
open access
Who Approved This? Coding Agents, Human Accounts, and Merge-Gate Evidence at a Fintech Startup
From 3 October, every non-bot merge into our main branch passed a non-author review gate, yet 71 of those 263 merges (27%) rested only on an approval that a coding agent had submitted through the technical lead's GitHub account, and the platform recorded each one as an ordinary approval by the lead.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do AI Coding Assistants Check Before They Install? A Pre-Registered Demand-Side Audit of Trust Signals in the Research Software Supply Chain#984654
- Wissenschaft der Logik#1207428
- FAIR by design (TRACE): A Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment.#975651
- AI Agent Pull Requests on GitHub: Frequency, Structure, and Merge Conflict Rates#1199897
- Who Is Behind the Harness? Fingerprinting LLMs through Agentic Behavior#1076215
Record · ID 1412924
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive