arXiv (All)
open access
Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate
Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) improves the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) through multi-round interaction. However, LLMs in MAD are highly susceptible to blind conformity. Existing individual evaluation methods, typically based on confidence or perplexity, fail to reflect the corre
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Symmetric Agents: Cognitive Diversity and Multi-Agent Debate in Small Language Models#1130717
- Bias Amplification in Multi-Agent Network: How Biased Agents Shape Opinions and Rhetoric#1012499
- Consensus and Factual Dynamics in Large Populations of Interacting Language Models#1144178
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1357971
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1348837
Record · ID 1413758
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive