arXiv (All)
open access
When Multiple Choices Are Correct: Asymmetric Probability Allocation in Jev and Other Decision Models
Decision models return normalized probability distributions over candidate choices, which downstream applications can use to select among choices. Although their providers emphasize the reliability of these probabilities, calibration on tasks with a single correct choice does not establish their rel
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are AI Decision Models Biased? A Case Study of Jev#1354309
- System1-Arena: Which Decisions Can Be Left to System 1?#1356580
- Controlled Acquisition and Abstention in Three-Channel Score Conflicts#1247735
- When Faster Decisions Do Not Make Better Agents: An Empirical Study of Jev in Agent Workflows#1297444
- Narrow Decision Models: A System-1 Architecture for Calibrated, Typed Decisions#1400377
Record · ID 1413822
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive