arXiv (All)
open access
Same Probabilities, Different Advice: Gain-Loss Framing Effects in High-Stakes LLM Decision Support
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support consequential decisions, yet their reliability under equivalent representations of uncertainty remains unclear. Existing work has documented prompt sensitivity, cognitive biases, and confidence miscalibration, but it is still unknown whet
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs#927819
- Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Models#1062665
- Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Models#1028739
- LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy#1118959
- The Effect of Emotional Context on Large Language Models' Endorsement of Premature Decisions: Comparing Emotional Vulnerability Across Six Commercial Models#780783
Record · ID 1413899
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive