CanLII
metadata only
Théberge v. PSHCP Administration Authority
Decided: 2026-10-15. Docket: T-2440-25. Citation: 2026 FC 861 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Jurisdiction — Federal Courts Act, s. 2, s. 18(1) — Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear the application for judicial review — Two-step enquiry from Anisman applied to identify the power and its source — Authority not a “federal board, commission or other tribunal” — Application dismissed | Administrative law — State authority — Public or private power — Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall, Air Canada v Toronto Port Authority — Whether the Authority’s decision-making is of a sufficiently public character — Plan described as a private health care insurance plan and a consensual regime — Decision on rejected claim characterised as p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Addressing Access to Justice Through New Legal Service Providers: Opportunities and Challenges#1021743
- Law Society of Alberta v Billingsley#638443
- Wells v Manitoba (Human Rights Commission)#638471
- Furtado v. Canada (Attorney General)#654259
- Law Society of Alberta v Smith#1166781
Record · ID 1415431
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive