CanLIImetadata only
Wells v Manitoba (Human Rights Commission)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, mbca, 2026mbca65, 2026 mbca 65 (canlii), 2026, mbca, 65, (canlii), ai25-30-10291, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, canada (minister of citizenship and immigration) v vavilov, 2019 scc 65, whether the reviewing judge correctly applied reasonableness to the commission decision, justification, intelligibility and transparency assessed on de novo review, rational chain of analysis and record considered, appeal dismissed, rights and freedoms, human rights, duty to accommodate, the human rights code, ccsm c h175, whether accommodations for the student’s disabilities were reasonable, reasonable accommodation, not perfect accommodation, investigation report, assessments, individual education plans, and relevant time frame considered, decision dismissing complaint upheld, appeal dismissed, rights and freedoms, human rights, education services, moore v british columbia (education), 2012 scc 61, whether moore is analogous and supports a finding of discrimination, distinction between no assessment of alternatives and numerous accommodations implemented, limited utility of moore in this appeal, conclusion that reasonable efforts were made maintained, appeal dismissed
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 638471
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.