ScholarlyCommons at Penn
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Is Additive Manufacturing of Dental Zirconia Comparable to Subtractive Methods When Considering Printing Orientation and Layer Thickness? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether the production of monolithic dental zirconia using additive manufacturing (AM), with consideration of different printing directions and layer thicknesses, enhances its mechanical and physical properties relative
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Additive Manufacturing of Dental Zirconia Comparable to Subtractive Methods When Considering Printing Orientation and Layer Thickness? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis#1416818
- 3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars#1185007
- Wear of Enamel Against Polished Zirconia Crowns#1382456
- Properties and Clinical Performance of Zirconia-based Dental Ceramics#1087030
- The Influence of Porcelain Fused to Metal ( PFM) and Zirconia Crowns on Periodontal Health#1101416
Record · ID 1416919
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive