arXiv (All)
open access
TrustedCode: Evaluating Large Language Models for Developing Trusted Code through Automated Program Verification
Recent reports, such as "Who is using AI to code?", indicate that approximately 30\% of Python code contributions to GitHub are AI-generated. Given the inherent unreliability of this code, formal verification emerges as a promising approach to establish trust in software correctness. Although levera
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TrustedCode: Evaluating Large Language Models for Developing Trusted Code through Automated Program Verification#1417910
- From Natural Language to Verified Code: Toward AI Assisted Problem-to-Code Generation with Dafny-Based Formal Verification#134579
- SkillForge: Compositional Skill Synthesis with Verification-in-the-Loop for Generating Formally Verified Dafny Programs#798464
- SkillForge: Compositional Skill Synthesis with Verification-in-the-Loop for Generating Formally Verified Dafny Programs#797051
- (Don't) Trust, but (Don't) Verify: Developers' Attention to Security in AI-Generated Code#1034990
Record · ID 1423224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive