arXiv (All)
open access
CARL: Chat Assisted Reinforcement Learning
Failure of applied Reinforcement Learning (RL) to solve a given problem predominantly stems from unaddressed specification gaps, where the intent of human experts in the problem's domain is inaccurately or incompletely translated by AI into mathematical objectives, constraints, and reward functions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- To Think or Not to Think: Allocating Reasoning Where It Helps#1077591
- Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Language Instruction: English Teachers’ Experiences with ChatGPT#430166
- KUAI-Kids: Developing a Measurement Instrument for Children’s Knowledge, Use, and Attitudes Toward Generative AI Chatbots#617133
- Reach or Solve? Deep Diving into Agentic RL Gains with Checkpoint Handoffs#1348960
- Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy#199401
Record · ID 1424132
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive