arXiv (All)
open access
How Different, or Different How? Stance Granularity in Viewpoint Selection for Dialog Systems that Engage Users with Alternative Views
Systems that aim to help a user engage with viewpoints other than their own have to decide how different those viewpoints should be. Viewpoints are mainly represented on a scalar scale, too coarse to distinguish viewpoints that disagree with the user about different things. We introduce a selection
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Towards Proactive Detection of User-Side Implicit Conflicts in Human-LLM Dialogue#1013756
- How Different Discussion Formats Shape Political Disagreement Between Citizens: Comparing Low and High Cue Interactions#16214
- CrossWeave: Bridging Perspectives Across Online Communities with a Dual-Pane Design#1234866
- Learning to Reason and Use Tools through Unsupervised Fine-Tuning in Task-Oriented Dialog Systems#799629
- Benevolent Bias in Multi-Turn Human-Agent Dialogue#794021
Record · ID 1424577
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive