eScholarship
metadata only
CC BY
Supporting informed decisions about tubal sterilization with a patient-facing website: a randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Interest in permanent contraception has increased in the US since the 2022 Dobbs decision restricted access to abortion in many states. Despite use of the federally mandated "consent for sterilization" form HHS-687, one of every five US patients who undergo tubal sterilization subsequent
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Driving Factors of Decision Making for Prophylactic Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Section#1407721
- Dilation and Curettage Versus Operative Hysteroscopy for Missed Abortion#840939
- Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#1419866
- When technology advances faster than competence: the risk of deskilling in obstetrics and gynecology.#402622
- Midwives' knowledge and practice of informed consent for vaginal examinations in intrapartum hospital care in Germany: A cross-sectional survey.#244556
Record · ID 1424949
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive