CanLII
metadata only
Bell Media Inc. v Singh
Decided: 2026-10-16. Docket: CA51746. Citation: 2026 BCCA 416 (CanLII). Procedure — Case management — Application to quash — Whether the motion to quash should be heard by a division or a single justice — Jurisdictional question described as sufficiently important — Default approach under Court of Appeal Rules considered — Motion directed to be decided by a division — Order made | Procedure — Preliminary objections — Lack of jurisdiction — Whether the motion to quash should be heard as a discrete issue before the appeal — Rule 60(4) timing addressed — Jurisdiction characterized as discrete and capable of resolution without merits review — Hearing ordered in advance of appeal, subject to division’s discretion — Order made | Procedure — Appeals — Publication ban — Appeal filed as civil appea
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Deco Windshield Repair Inc v Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation#1435204
- Degen v Bowers#1435200
- Kawun v Edmonton (City)#1435202
- R v Sun#1435203
- Caplan and Company Ltd v Lyons#1435205
Record · ID 1435201
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive