CanLII
metadata only
Kawun v Edmonton (City)
Decided: 2026-10-23. Docket: 2603-0149AC. Citation: 2026 ABCA 339 (CanLII). Administrative law — Permission to appeal — Municipal Government Act, s 688(3) — Test for permission to appeal requiring question of law or jurisdiction — Reasonable chance of success and sufficient importance assessed — Challenges framed as mixed fact and law and discretion — Application dismissed | Procedure — Appeals — Permission to appeal — Whether extricable question of law or jurisdiction arises from “Use” classification — Architectural drawings and specifications treated as authoritative record — Basement found wet bar, not “Dwelling” under Zoning Bylaw, s 8.10 — Permission to appeal denied | Municipalities — Land use planning — Zoning bylaws — Whether Development Permit “Use” conditions were unauthorized un
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Sun#1435203
- Bell Media Inc. v Singh#1435201
- Deco Windshield Repair Inc v Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation#1435204
- Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro v Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities#1435206
- Degen v Bowers#1435200
Record · ID 1435202
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive