Conceptio › Archive › arXiv (OAI)
arXiv (OAI) open access

Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification

Nini, Andrea et al. · 2024 · arxiv_oai
arXiv (OAI) · Papers · 2024
Open Source ↗Direct PDF ↓
computation-and-languagemachine-learning
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

[2403.08462] Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2403.08462 (cs) [Submitted on 13 Mar 2024 ( v1 ), last revised 10 Apr 2026 (this version, v3)] Title: Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification Authors: Andrea Nini , Oren Halvani , Lukas Graner , Sophie Titze , Valerio Gherardi , Shunichi Ishihara View a PDF of the paper titled Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification, by Andrea Nini and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Authorship Verification (AV) is a key area of research in digital text forensics, which addresses the fundamental question of whether two texts were written by the same person. Numerous computational approaches have been proposed over the last two decades in an attempt to address this challenge. However, existing AV methods often suffer from high complexity, low explainability and especially from a lack of clear scientific justification. We propose a simpler method based on modeling the grammar of an author following Cognitive Linguistics principles. These models are used to calculate $\lambda_G$ (LambdaG): the ratio of the likelihoods of a document given the candidate's grammar versus given a reference population's grammar. Our empirical evaluation, conducted on twelve datasets and compared against seven baseline methods, demonstrates that LambdaG achieves superior performance, including against several neural network-based AV methods. LambdaG is also robust to small variations in the composition of the reference population and provides interpretable visualizations, enhancing its explainability. We argue that its effectiveness is due to the method's compatibility with Cognitive Linguistics theories predicting that a person's grammar is a behavioral biometric. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) ; Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2403.08462 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2403.08462v3 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.08462 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Journal reference: Humanit Soc Sci Commun 13, 455 (2026) Related DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06340-3 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Andrea Nini [ view email ] [v1] Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:25:47 UTC (319 KB) [v2] Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:12:57 UTC (791 KB) [v3] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:33:25 UTC (779 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification, by Andrea Nini and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL < prev | next > new | recent | 2024-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from

Related documents

Record · ID 144200 · SHA-256 159fc5f541c7c012
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive