arXiv (All)
open access
Free Lunch for LLMs Confidence: The RL Critic Already Knows
Reliable confidence estimation is essential for trustworthy deployment of large language models (LLMs), but dedicated confidence training stage requires additional data and compute. We ask a fundamental question: what prediction problem does confidence training actually solve? Inspired by prior work
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs#927819
- LLMs learn different forms of metacognition when trained to predict their own accuracy#1118959
- When Linguistic and Internal Confidence Diverge in Large Language Models#927455
- Learned Readout Tokens for Extracting Large Language Model Confidence#1403362
- Cross-Entropy Risk Estimation for Language Models: Inconsistency Must Be Dense, and the Holdout Method Is No Exception#616936
Record · ID 1446865
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive