arXiv (All)
open access
Tampered ML: Evaluating LLM Judgment of Machine Learning Research
One approach to accelerating progress on AI alignment is to automate parts of alignment research itself. Doing so requires systems that can perform reliably on hard-to-supervise research tasks, including identifying flaws in research proposals and evaluating whether a proposed experiment supports it
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Design principles for integrated AI alignment.#371474
- Auditing Political Alignment in LLM Assistants: Engagement, Stance, and User Identity#1048434
- Towards Knowledge Alignment in Code LLMs: Contrastive Unlearning for Evolving APIs#324973
- Verify Less, Evolve More: Training Idea-Level Critics for Verification-Efficient ML Evolving Agents#1233032
- When Accuracy Gaps Fail to Certify: Auditing Cross-Domain Recalibration of LLM Judges#1064498
Record · ID 1447481
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive