arXiv (All)
open access
From Faulty Claims to Incorrect Patches: An Empirical Study of Task-Grounded Reasoning in Coding Agents
Large language model (LLM)-based coding agents increasingly resolve real-world software engineering tasks, yet still fail on many of them. Prior trajectory studies characterize these failures through task-agnostic patterns of agent behavior, such as repeated actions. However, an agent may follow a s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Faulty Claims to Incorrect Patches: An Empirical Study of Task-Grounded Reasoning in Coding Agents#1442435
- CodePori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology#1199619
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#798236
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#796823
- Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback#1344257
Record · ID 1447705
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive