Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
Charting the AI perception gap: divergent views on risk, benefit, and value between experts and the public challenge the societal acceptance of AI
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What it is like to engage with AI#393595
- Biased AI improves human performance but reduces perceived helpfulness#1036566
- Public perception of AI risks mirrors nuclear fears#160505
- The Potential Harms of AI Psychotherapy: A Fear as Old as ELIZA#83954
- AI's assigned gender affects human-AI cooperation#119162
Record · ID 145130
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive