ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of McGrath, Pentax and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal Intubation in Pediatrics
Videolaryngoscope provide better view of the larynx. This better view could improve the navigation of endotracheal tube in nasotracheal intubation. Contrast to the improved result in adult, one previous report using Glidescope in children did not show better performance than direct laryngoscope. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of McGrath, Pentax and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in children.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study#1246996
- Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old#1438381
- Comparison of SensaScope Intuboscope and McGrath Series 5 for Endotracheal Intubation#864454
- Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes#1165160
- VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study#829572
Record · ID 1451623
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive