ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study
This study will compare the CMAC and Glidescope videolaryngoscopes (VL) to traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL) using either a Miller or Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of users. This will involve the use of an intubating pediatric manikin to assess various aspects of endotracheal intubation by experienced and inexperienced users.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Infant Glidescope® Learning Curve#1074162
- Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes#1165160
- Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department#841972
- A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.#909552
- Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin by Novice#855609
Record · ID 829572
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive