arXiv (All)
open access
Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models
Do preferences Large Language Models (LLMs) express in standard elicitation tasks predict their strategic behaviour? LLM agents interacting with humans and other AI systems face potentially conflicting objectives, such as individual welfare, group welfare, and environmental concerns. Prior work char
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Choosing LLMs for Strategic Agent Interactions#1343866
- LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency#16624
- Think Before You Speak: Enabling Training-Free Latent Communication Between Language Models#1327755
- Right Answers, Costly Models: The Efficiency Gap in LLM-based Optimization Modeling#1143485
- Agentic Large Language Models#1297807
Record · ID 1456474
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive