arXiv (All)
open access
EAST: Embodied AI Safety Testing via Systematic Fault Injection in Digital Twins
Task success is not a sufficient measure of safety for embodied artificial intelligence (AI), because robots may complete objectives while violating safety requirements. Existing evaluations often emphasize performance and robustness, but lack a systematic route from documented safety hazards to exe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EAST: Embodied AI Safety Testing via Systematic Fault Injection in Digital Twins#1450880
- Encoding the Enforcement of Safety Standards into Smart Robots to Harness Their Computing Sophistication and Collaborative Potential: A Legal Risk Assessment for European Union Policymakers#679212
- From bits to atoms: A survey of cross-layer safety in Embodied AI#1324639
- Rethinking World Models for Safety-Critical Embodied Systems#926660
- The Core-Modulation Architecture: Paper 4 of 14 (d-AIB) Why General AI Inherited the Body: A Structural Account of Embodied Modulation under Monolithic Imitation#122413
Record · ID 1457512
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive