ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
LVHR Multicenter Study
The study aims to prove differences or equalities in outcome for patients operated with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with different methods of fixation of mesh and with or without approximation of defect prior to meshfixation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair#867377
- Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP#868099
- Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?#1337071
- Long-term Follow-up of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Emergency Laparotomy.#848276
- ProLOVE - Prospective Randomized Study of Midline Incisional Hernia Treatment#1385115
Record · ID 1463228
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive