ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effect of Standard Laryngoscopy Versus Video-laryngoscopy
The aim of this open-label, randomized, 3-parallel arm trial is to compare success of intubation rate at first try between three groups that will be intubated: 1. Conventional intubation with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope (control group), 2. Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, 3. Intubation ProVu TM video stylet combined with standard Macintosh laryngoscope.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study#1246996
- Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department#841972
- Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope#1214441
- The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients#1125517
- McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room#1113273
Record · ID 1464629
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive