ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department
This is an open-label, single center, prospective, randomized, comparative, intervention study. The goal of this study is to compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy for first pass oro tracheal intubation. The other question it aims to answer are: 1. To assess the adverse events during video laryngoscopy 2. To assess the adverse events during direct Laryngoscopy 3. To compare the first pass success rate of DL vs VL according to demographic profile (age and sex)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients#1125517
- Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes#1165160
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
- Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation#1008563
- McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room#1113273
Record · ID 841972
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive