arXiv (All)
open access
Quantifying Claim Smoothing by LLM Research Agents
Deep research, or any use of large language models (LLMs) to read a large document collection and produce insights, requires synthesizing information from different sources. In this work, we find that LLMs produce long-form research reports that read as confident syntheses but which fail to accurate
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large Language Model Turnover Undermines Screening for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Scientific Writing#1248879
- ABSOL: Aggregated Bayesian Subsampling Orchestrated with LLMs#1084906
- ProjectionBench: Evaluating Scientific Hypothesis Generation in LLMs Under Progressive Information Disclosure#238649
- FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers#1422783
- The Ability of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate the Quality of Scholarly Output#1360410
Record · ID 1466832
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive