arXiv (All)
open access
Confidence Is Not a Promise: A Reference Audit of Typed Decision Models
Typed decision models return a probability distribution over options supplied by the caller, and software tends to act on that number as if it were a guarantee. We measure what it licenses, comparing the open-weight Laya, in five checkpoints, with Jev 1.13, available only through an API. A probabili
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Benchmarking System One decision models against trained classifiers and language models for automated decision gates#1154969
- Lost in the Fallback: How Reliably Do Typed Decision Models Use Fallback Options?#1354539
- Lost in the Fallback: How Reliably Do Typed Decision Models Use Fallback Options?#1335925
- Benchmarking candidate coverage and rejection policy transfer in typed decision models#1393805
- Benchmarking Candidate Coverage in Typed Decision Models#1188065
Record · ID 1467635
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive