arXiv (All)
open access
When Visual Evidence Is Insufficient: How Instructions, Post-Training, and Internal Activations Shape Refusal in Multimodal Language Models
For reliable deployment, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) should recognize when an image provides insufficient evidence to answer a question and withhold unsupported answers. Yet refusal alone is not necessarily evidence of such recognition: models may refuse because of unrelated safety cons
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- QG-CoC: Question-Guided Chain-of-Captions for Large Multimodal Models#1389133
- A$^2$Safe: Counterfactual Evidence-Aligned Adaptive Agent Collaboration for Safe and Effective Visual Question Answering#1050284
- Detecting Misbehaviors of Large Vision-Language Models by Evidential Uncertainty Quantification#1413598
- Harnessing Textual Refusal Directions for Multimodal Safety#1388402
- From Compound Figures to Medical Multi-image Reasoning: Scaling Multimodal Large Language Models with Biomedical Literature#1142587
Record · ID 1469033
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive