Conceptio › Archive › CanLII
CanLII metadata only

R v McDermott

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal
Open Source ↗
appealcanadacanadiancase-lawcourt-opinionevidenceproceduretranscript
Decided: 2026-10-26. Docket: 2503-0054A. Citation: 2026 ABCA 341 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeal — Sexual interference — Whether jury instruction answers were accurate and sufficient — Jury questions about absent witnesses, transcript, and police statements — Functional and contextual assessment of jury instructions, R v Peterson, R v Abdullahi — No reviewable error found — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Jury instructions — Jury questions — Did trial judge’s answer about why witnesses were not called require a direction not to speculate — Reasonable doubt arising from absence of evidence referenced — Prior closing instructions and written copy considered — Brief but accurate answers permitted, R v Abdullahi — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Jury deliberations — Transcript
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1481046
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive