ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Rotational Angiography/Electroanatomical Mapping Fusion Versus CT/Electroanatomical Mapping Fusion to Guide AF Ablation
The purpose of this study is to compare rotational angiography (3DATG technology)intra-procedure (during the ablation procedure) with CT (x-ray) pre-procedure (before the ablation procedure) fusion to create an anatomical picture of a heart to help adequately guide an ablation procedure for patients with arrhythmias.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Usefulness of Virtual Ablation Guided Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Virtual Rotor Mapping and Catheter Ablation#860259
- Fluoroscopic, Contact Force and Local Impedance With Ultra-high Density Mapping Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Comparison for cavoTricuspid Isthmus dependenT Atrial fluttER: the FLUTTER Study#1088344
- Empirical Anatomy-Based Ablation vs Emphasize Map-Guided Substrate Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation : (COMPASS-AF)#1228983
- Real-Time Intracardiac Echocardiography for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation#802167
- Atrial Fibrillation Ablation The Hybrid Approach Versus Traditional Management#893257
Record · ID 1486530
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive