arXiv (All)
open access
How Do Developers Edit AI-Generated Code, and How Well Do LLMs Infer Their Edits? Insights from 53.6K Developer Edits
Imperfections in AI-generated code require that software developers modify generations through manual code edits. However, little is known about how developers edit AI-generated code, and to what extent LLMs can infer implicit developer intent from this data, given the lack of high-quality, realisti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Line-Anchored Feedback Cuts Token Costs and Improves Correctness in AI Code Editing#366316
- Unveiling the evolution of generative AI (GAI): a comprehensive and investigative analysis toward LLM models (2021–2024) and beyond#808650
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1036459
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1006921
- Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting#1143432
Record · ID 1488428
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive