arXiv (All)
open access
Disparity Laundering: Consensus Without Fairness in Clinical Multi-Agent Systems
Clinical large language models are increasingly fielded as multi-agent teams, on the assumption that deliberation averages out individual error. It does not average out bias. Across a full factorial of five model families and four aggregation topologies on 120 real MIMIC-IV emergency cases under cou
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Agent Role Structure and Operating Characteristics in Large Language Model Clinical Classification: A Comparative Study of Specialist and Deliberative Multi-Agent Protocols#321462
- On the possibilities and limitations of LLM-based multi-agent systems for multi-criteria decision-making in healthcare operations management#1388046
- On the possibilities and limitations of LLM-based multi-agent systems for multi-criteria decision-making in healthcare operations management#1375066
- Clinician use of language models diverges from how the models are evaluated#1247996
- Autonomous Event-Driven Multi-Agent Orchestration for Enterprise AI at Scale#1128612
Record · ID 1489007
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive