arXiv (All)
open access
Benchmarking decision models against generative large language models on medical multiple-choice questions
Medical workflows often require selecting among predefined options. We compared 13 decision models with 15 generative large language model configurations, including different reasoning settings, using 1,273 four-option MedQA questions under text-only conditions. Accuracy ranged from 67.71% to 89.08%
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The performance of ChatGPT and other large language models on multiple-choice questions in biomedical disciplines: A meta-analysis.#662850
- Jev-ToM: Evaluating Theory of Mind in Typed Decision Models#1344110
- Assessing multiple-choice question quality in internal medicine: a comparative analysis of three large language models against expert consensus.#399799
- Why LLMs Give In: Conversational Factors and Reasoning Behind Medical Sycophancy#799024
- Why LLMs Give In: Conversational Factors and Reasoning Behind Medical Sycophancy#797609
Record · ID 1489518
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive